You know the drill: I share the best stuff Iāve been reading, listening to and watching lately. Letās get right to it.Ā
BOOKS
Evelyn Waugh: Decline and Fall (1928)
Excellent black comedy. Had so many thoughts on it they turned into their own post. Coming soon.
MUSIC
James Brown: Black Caesar (1973)
Song for song, James Brown is one of my favourite artists of all time. But until relatively recently Iād always been wary of delving too deep into the albums, assuming he was basically a singles artist who padded his LPs out with blues jams and sentimental ballads. Big mistake. As a soundtrack album Black Caesar should be as fillerish as records get, but in fact itās packed with gems. Iāve no idea why āDown and Out in New York Cityā isnāt a stone-cold classicāāāa James Brown song with a chorus! And what a chorus!āāābut as it is I might never have heard it if it hadnāt been featured in the recent Malcolm and Marie. As for the rest, you have an actual stone-cold classic in āThe Bossā, tasty instrumental noodling on āBlind Man Can See Itā and āWhite Lightningā, uptempo dance music on āMake It Good to Yourselfā, frenetic thrills on āChaseā and Brown-scatting-accompanied-by-himself-on-piano on āLike It Is, Like It Wasā. Plus a blistering guest spot from the wonderful Lyn Collins on āMama Feelgoodā. And yes, a little filler. But it is a soundtrack album.
Ā Various classic blues artists (1920s-70s)
Besides Howlinā Wolf and John Lee Hooker, Iād never really investigated the blues masters beyond a compilation or two and scattered tracks by Albert King, Little Walter and a few others. But I recently picked up compilations by Muddy Waters, Elmore James and Blind Willie McTellāāāwho you may have heard of thanks to this manāāāand listening to them inspired me to cast the net further and get a serious Spotify playlist going.
So far my favourite discoveries are James (that muscular voice! That attitude! That slide! That groove!) and Mississippi John Hurt (that warm, engaging voice! Those beautiful melodies! That friendly, inviting feel!). I like to think I can detect echoes of their singing styles in my beloved Bob DylanāāāI hear a lot of Hurtās gentle tunefulness in his early sweet side, and I hear Jamesā startling bursts of speak-singing in his electric-trilogy sarcastic side.
I knew the 1960s British blues revival owed their sound to these guys, but I hadnāt realised just how much they directly lifted from their source materialāāāIāve been recognising riff after riff and line after line from all those Bluesbreakers and Led Zeppelin songs. Iām also hearing startlingly crunchy riffs (this is from 1951!!), seriously distorted harmonica (this is from 1952!!) and truly wild guitar solos (this is from 1954!!). (1954!! Thatās before Elvis even had a drummer!)
Funnily enough the artist Iāve been having the least success with is perhaps the most famousāāāMuddy Waters. Now his ā70s update of his classic āMannish Boyā has always been my favourite classic blues of them all. But nothing else Iāve heard comes close for meāāāI just donāt hear the hair-raising vocals of Wolf, the wild energy of James, the intricate fingerpicking of McTell, the guitar chops of Albert King or the atmospheric darkness of Lightninā Hopkins. No element of the sound really grabs me in either his acoustic or his electric period. So far anyway. Itās early days.
FILMS, TV & A LITTLE THEATRE FOR AĀ CHANGE
Beyond the Fringe (1962 performance)
As you may have gathered by now Iām big on cultural archaeologyāāāif rockās based on the blues I want to hear the blues, if blues is based on West African music I want to hear West African music, etc. So when it comes to comedy, if a lot of todayās stuff can be traced back to Peter Cook, and if Peter Cookās career can be traced back to this show, I want to see this show. Fortunately itās available on YouTube.
The facts: Beyond the Fringe was a stage revue in the early ā60s starring Cook, Dudley Moore, Alan Bennett and Jonathan Miller that took the West End by storm before becoming a hit on Broadway. Its willingness to mock authority and tackle pretty much any subject was revolutionary at the time and paved the way for all the great British satire to come, as well as being heavily influential on surrealists like Monty Python. (Read more about it here.)
The opinion: I enjoyed this a lot. I was surprised at how gentle the jabs were by modern standards (hell, by Evelyn Waughās standards), at least on the night thatās been preserved. The show doesnāt go after political institutions nearly as hard as Yes, Minister or The Thick of It, but on the plus side its remit is a lot broader: it affectionately pokes fun at everything from Anglo-American relations to class to Elizabethan theatre to the Second World War. The parodies of Shakespeare and modern philosophy may be the most eloquent comedy Iāve ever seenāāānot side-splittingly funny, but dazzlingly articulate and 100% accurate (Miller and Bennettās āOxfordā mannerisms are perfect). Meanwhile Bennettās take-off of a bland, rambling Church of England sermon is genuinely pricelessāāāthe precursor to Father Trendy and Billy Connollyās āfootball matchā homily.
Then thereās Moore, the most versatile actor and general all-rounder of the bunch. As a pianist myself, I gotta say he could outplay Bill Bailey and Tim Minchin on a childās toy Casio if all his limbs were tied behind his back, he was asleep and he was nowhere near the Casio. Heās amazing. In keeping with the showās highbrow tone he chooses Beethoven to parody, and he gets everything exactly right. The way he takes the simple theme, obsessively develops it, plays it in different styles and rhythms, gets busy with the left hand, uses just about every note on the keyboard, ends the piece a million timesāāāexactly right. Again, not side-splitting so much as just technically jaw-dropping: never mind playing it, how do you write this stuff?
Finally thereās Cook himself, the showās main writer and the general Shaper of British Comedy for Years to Come. Itās already obvious from Beyond the Fringe that satire is only a small element of what he does: his main goal is to use language as inventively as he possibly can. (Some day Iām gonna write a post about the similarities between him and my favourite comedian, Norm Macdonald: both got pigeonholed in the āsatireā genre early but are surrealist storytellers at heart; both are in it for the comedy, not the career ambition; both are reclusive by fame-hungry celebrity standards; both use language in a completely unique way; both do their best work in character; both use improv as a key element of their shtick; both are fundamentally Agents of Chaos who want to Make Everything as Silly as Possible, no more, no less.)
So we get the āOne Leg Too Fewā sketch, where Cook tells a hopping Dudley Moore that heās not right for the part of Tarzan. We get āThe Great Train Robberyā, which reminds me of one of those Two Ronnies bits where the wordplay is so clever it doesnāt seem right to call it āpunningā. Is it still punning if youāre subtly twisting the meanings of phrases rather than just calling attention to the fact that some words sound like other words? Anyway.
And then we get the āExperiences Down the Mineā monologue, whichā¦well. Like a lot of my favourite comedy, this one feels like something slightly different to comedy. The story is funny, but somehow calling it funny feels like itās sort of missing the point. As with all his creations Cookās fully in character but somehow not the character at all, just eternally Peter Cook, staring at you with that quiet, tragic Zen stillness. His minerās proto-Monty Python ramblings communicate something thatāāāto me anywayāāāgoes beyond humour into something deeper and sadder, and all without trying to. Like a Kate Bush performance, the whole thing has a mysterious effect on you thatās hard to put into words because the emotions have nothing to do with words. Itās surrealist art. You canāt define it.
And thatās how I feel about Beyond the Fringe in general: it transcends not just satire but all categories. Like Bo Burnhamās what., itās a comedy show, but itās more just a showāāāa totally unique blend of history, politics, social commentary, wordplay, music, surrealism, theatricality and plain silliness.
As I watched āThe Aftermyth of Warā, a sort of mini-play about World War Two and its effects on everyone who participated in it, I noticed I was actually getting a little moved. Here I was watching four young men processing the cruelties, distortions and traumas of an unthinkable catastrophe that had happened in recent memory, and making something weirdly beautiful out of it all. Now their interpretation has itself become part of history. And to paraphrase the miner, what a fascinating old part it is.
The King of Comedy (1982)
More black comedy. This was a rewatch for meāāāfirst saw it in collegeāāāand I enjoyed it just as much this time round. Maybe the least famous of the classic Scorsese-De Niro collaborations, The King of Comedy was seriously underrated at the time and remains seriously underwatched today.
Like so many comedies of its type, the film works on two levels: thereās the disconnect between how talented De Niroās mentally unstable aspiring comedian thinks he is (world-class) and how talented he actually is (heās alright), and then thereās an underlying message about the wider sickness prevailing in a culture that says it doesnāt matter whether youāre renowned or notorious as long as youāre famous. (If all this sounds familiar, yes, 2019ās Joker was heavily based on this film.)
Some critics werenāt convinced by the movieās uncentred feeling or its odd toneāāāEmpire said āNeither funny enough to be an effective black comedy nor scary enough to capitalise on its thriller/horror elementsāāāābut the unpredictability and emotional ambiguity are exactly what I like about it. Itās true that the movieās so dark that Iād hesitate to call it a comedy at all: the extent of the ākingāsā delusions and the things he and his psychotic friend are willing to do to get what they want are truly unsettling. And itās also true that whenever things are in danger of getting too heavy and uncomfortable a punchline will come along and half-save the day. But donāt you get a similar mix of laughs, grimaces and unsettling plot twists in the most effective satire Iāve ever read, Catch-22? Or, I dunno, in life?
Killing Eve season 1 (2018)
Yet another black comedy. Well, a thriller with black comedy elements. Iāve just seen the first season so far: enjoying it, nice understated acting, good sense of humour (of both the āwry Englishā and the āseriously dark Englishā variety), plenty of action, sometimes fun and sometimes seriously disturbing villain, lots of snappy dialogue that sees the usual āsnappy dialogueā tropes coming and swerves to miss them, and the portrayals of friendship and marriage are refreshingly down-to-earth and un-clichĆ©dāāābut of course they are, the writerās Phoebe Waller-Bridge, whose Fleabag I was just raving about the other week. Underappreciated Scorsese films are all very well, but youāve got to have a fun and undemanding show to pull out when you want to sag, and if this one keeps the quality going for the next couple of seasons (both written by other people) itāll do that for me for the next while. Provided I can get over those last few episodesāāāwhen I said ādisturbingā I meant itā¦