Hippies Were Better at Feeling than We Are
3rd and final part of the Hippy Series: music, joy, freedom, mysticism
As the subtitle suggests, this is the last part of a broader essay about historyās most blissed-out generation. It can also be read alone if you like reading things alone.
Part 1, which focuses more on politics, is here. Part 2, which focuses more on peace ānā love ānā morality, is here.
āWe were talking about hippy music.ā
āAh, the music. Wild, ebullient, unashamedly melodic. You donāt hear the Sixties in the lyrics, you hear it in the notesāāāin the rhythms, the energy, the optimism and freedom. Black music has always had those things, but very little white music from Handel up to early rock ānā roll managed to combine all of them. And very little has since.ā
āI know you well enough to know that for you āMusic has gotten worseā is the same as āEverythingās gotten worseā.ā
āDamn right. Musicās the most accurate cultural barometer there is. Thereās been tons of incredible stuff from the mid-ā70s right up to now, but it canāt make the same impact because the spirit that drove it in 1966 is dead. Take the innocence and spontaneity out of pop and youāve taken away the animating principle of āWaterloo Sunsetā and āSummer in the Cityā. They aimed for beauty with no self-consciousness, no caution, no fear of making a mistake. They had something to convey and they conveyed it.ā
āDid they though? A lot of the lyrics from the time, including the protest ones, are pretty indirect, nondescriptāāātame. The radio stations and record company executives made sure of that.ā
āBut the stuff that made it into the albums was only hinting at the stuff people were really saying, and all the āhipā crowd knew it. Signalling to them in your lyrics became a kind of game bands would play. By the way, have you noticed how the slightest sex or drug reference in a good ā60s song is more exciting than the most provocative material we can come up with today?ā

āDepends on how you define āexcitingā. To me any given Kendrick Lamar track is significantly more exciting and on point than any ā60s protest song you could name.ā
āWhereas to me Jim Morrison barking āShe get highā is more thrilling than every drug reference of the last 20 years put together. Hell, the censored āShe get [radio silence]ā version is more thrilling. Itās rebellion that isnāt nihilistic, rebellion with a direction, utopian rebellion. Its aims werenāt realised, but in the 3 minutes youāre listening to āBreak On Throughā its aims are realised. The song shows you what highness feels like, what human potential sounds like. As I say, itās really more about the notes and rhythms than the wordsāāāthey flesh out every thought and make every sentiment ten times as grand as it has any right to be.ā
āThe trouble is that you can only ābreak on throughā once, and once youāve done it thereās nowhere left to go.ā
āRight. Nothingās shocking now, so even if modern lyrics objectively āgo furtherā than old onesāāāand they donāt, because they donāt have a mystical dimensionāāāthen they canāt convey the same sense of newfound freedom. Because music exists in a social context, itās less exciting to hear extreme lyrics now than 50-year-old lyrics that sound tame today but would have been very shocking at the time. Youāre imagining yourself hearing them for the first time back then. Itās sort of empathic listening, secondhand titillation.ā
āWhat did you mean just then about the āmystical dimensionā?ā
āIf the hippies have just one advantage over us itās that weāve abandoned spiritual joy. That applies to everything: not just music but music commentary, all writing, all cultural criticism. We decided to continue in the vein of the Velvet Underground and not the Doors, Robert Christgau and not Greil Marcus, Noam Chomsky and not Allen Ginsberg. Not dissing anyone in the list, but a trendās a trend. Everythingās just become very hardheaded, angry and practical. You arenāt allowed wonder at things. You arenāt allowed feel awe.ā

āI would have to agree that ājoyā, āwonderā and āaweā are words youāre only allowed use until you turn 12 or at Christmas.ā
āRight, and I canāt imagine anything more spiritually stunted. People will throw any flavour out of the cultural stew if it reminds them of Communion wine, and pretty soon all youāve got is water. At some point people separated joy out from fun and said that only the second was worth aiming for. I donāt know why you canāt have both.ā
āAnd I donāt know what youāre talking about any more.ā
āJust watch Becoming Nobody. Thatās joy. Thatās freedom. Intellectuals-turned-mystics like Ram Dass and Alan Watts couldnāt have gained purchase in any other age than the ā60s: people were too straight-laced before and too cynical afterwards. They preached humour, fun, liberation and the transcending of the ego. That last one is important. The Boomer generation may have been the first to say the personal is political. But they also knew that neither the personal nor the political were everything. Rather than celebrating identity, the hippie mystics urged us to transcend it: become nobody. Not so weād have less fun, so weād have more. The point was to enjoy life without worrying about where you fit into it. So we didnāt have to be anything. We could just be. Total openness, total freedom. The fact that 99% of people hate and ridicule that mentality now without making the effort to understand it firstā¦well, itās just profoundly sad.ā
āYou could argue that healthy skepticism is safer: better than being taken in by smooth-talking gurus, joining cultsā¦ā
āCourse itās safer. But I like the idea of having heroes, of looking up to peopleāāānot because theyāre virtuous or righteously angry, but because theyāre radiant.ā
āIāve always liked the word āradiantā. Seems like a good place to wrap things up.ā

āFair enough. Iāll finish with this. The hippie movement wasnāt the most pragmatic, rational, organised thing in the world because that wasnāt the point. The point was to be. Specifically to be young, wild, free and happyāāāto free up your emotions and live your life. Asking people to turn all that Dionysian abandon into an Apollonian plan of action would be like asking Dean Moriarty to run for Congress. The movement was based on being younger than 30. When all its members hit 30 the movement died. You canāt hold onto your youth.ā
āRight. Whatever your feelings about hippyism, it was never going to survive undiluted.ā
āThe things that were best about it were the same things that doomed it to fade away. It couldnāt have lasted, nor should it haveāāāit was a beautiful moment, and beautiful moments donāt last. A holidayās a holiday because you come home again. If you donāt come home the place youāre in becomes your home, and suddenly youāre no longer on holiday.ā